That classic Gough Whitlam campaign slogan “It’s Time”, is as relevant today in 2015 as it was the day his campaign launched in 1972.
The space for progressive political and economic change is once again widening, after having come under repeated attack by conservatives ever since Gough was dismissed via Double Dissolution in 1975.
At Progress, I attended a workshop called “Moving the Rock – Shifting Power for Sustained Change”, hosted by Sam La Rocca and Holly Hammond. Points raised in that workshop provided some of the key takeaways for me. Particularly, a strong reminder about the value and role of radicals.
It’s about the intersection of what is ideal and what is ‘politically achievable’.
In this context, the rock represents activated social values, and what is politically achievable is like a balloon tied to that rock.
The limitations of what is politically possible are directly defined by which ‘social values’ are being activated in a community, and to what extent.
When intrinsic values are activated, they create space for communitarian policy responses. When extrinsic values are activated, they shut down that space.
Radical opinions, as well as radical actions, expand the parameters of what options can be considered reasonable in response to an issue.
Every time a coal train is blocked, the space for proposing strong government policy on renewable energy grows and regulation on pollution grows.
Every time a farm gate is locked against fracking, the space for local governments to declare themselves gasfield free increases.
Every time a forest activist locks on, the space for progressives to negotiate Government’s protections in the area grows dramatically.
Of course, the same applies on the other end:
When a Liberal Party leader screams “child abuse” at an Aboriginal community, ‘moderates’ are more likely to accept the shutting off water and electricity in remote communities.
When the media put the jaws of Great White Shark on the newspapers front page with headlines screaming “MONSTER” or “ATTACK”, the space for reasonable discussion about protecting Great White Sharks diminishes.
When ill-informed people are left unchallenged as they scream “THEY ARE STEALING OUR JOBS”, the space for anti-immigration policies grows.
The most extreme voices always define the outer parameters of a debate.
So it stands then, that as long as there are radical conservative voices, then equally radical progressive ones are required to create equal space for moderate progressives to negotiate in.
But it’s more than that too.
The middle ground also defines itself. It defines itself by setting the boundaries of what compromises it is willing to make, and by showing how much power it can exert.
It’s not just the actions at the extremes which define the limits of what is achievable, but also the strength and regularity of the actions taken by those in ‘middle’.
If moderate progressives fail to organise and fail to take regular action on an issue, that space will be filled by moderate conservatives instead. But if moderate progressives get organised and take regular, strong actions, we can pull the middle ground to the left too.
It’s time. Let’s work together – moderate and radical progressives alike – to activate intrinsic social values and shift that rock, just like Gough.
PS: I’ve just launched an email list to help me help my networks stay in contact, if you want to join in, you can sign up here.
Additional resource: Read Daniel’s book “Strategy and Soul”, the story of the David vs Goliath campaign to defeat unpopular casino development in Philadelphia