Podcast EP7 – Housing Affordability, Edward Snowden and the Manning Trial

Episode 7 of the (un) Common Sense Podcast is now available!

This episode of the podcast includes:

[powerpress]

Continue reading Podcast EP7 – Housing Affordability, Edward Snowden and the Manning Trial

Everything must change

There comes a line when politicking blurs the mind of even the most intelligent and compassionate people and I believe I have long ago past that point. I believe I have been mislead into not seeing both realities of the world; the political reality and the individual reality.

The political reality is the one where everything is examined as part of a greater whole; “in context”. The individual reality is the one about which your care for each individual equally; or at least care an equal amount for the rights and lives of each individual you know of, and more so for those you know personally.

There also comes a time when reality hits home as one of those you truly care for has issues that cannot be solved easily; and especially when you have no control or even influence over the prevailing circumstance and the decisions that then need to be made.

Recently Sunshine’s father has been receiving death threats.

It has been going on a while now. Sunshine is a 16 year old girl from Mosul in Northern Iraq who has been both an inspiration and a friend to me. I try help her with life in any way I may and she looks up to me for it.

Unfortunately I feel hopeless with fear when I hear of the conditions she lives in worsening in such a way; when it gets beyond the point I believe her and her family capable of handling. Where to turn to now?

Where’s my government stand on all this?

Why aren’t we opening our arms to thousands of refugees from the country we’ve invaded?

Why are we so fearful of a backlash if we do let these people enjoy our better lives?

Don’t we need more skilled workers, doctors, dentists, nurses, teachers, lecturers and tradesmen?

WHERE IS MY REPRESENTATION?

Who do I have to sleep with to get a REAL say in this “democracy”?

Who can I actually speak to that has enough influence to relay my messages and give me a chance to argue for immediate foreign policy change?

Why must I spend years of planning and hard work to even get a word in? Is my opinion not as equal as those who sit in the seats of power and influence? Must I be an old man (or woman) with money, a family and a working history somehow related to Australian politics before I can be heard?

I’m going to phone my local MP and demand an audience. I’m going to continue doing this until I get an ear that will listen and represent me truly. It is time to make a change in this government; it is time to make a change in this world.

It’s time to start moving and start walking.

It’s time for EVERY THING TO CHANGE.

5 years too many

It’s the 5th anniversary of perhaps the biggest atrocity my country has been involved in since my coming into the ability to understand the consequences of war.

Iraqi’s, I apologize that I FAILED to stop the invasion those years ago; and I PROMISE to make as much of a mends as can be made; when the chance to do so should arise.

*nothing else to say*.

Reflections on 2007

A little over a month ago I blogged the pre-election post “May the Lesser Evil Win” and the lesser evil did win, considerably well too. It’s a first in the part of my since I have actually understood the significance of a new government.

Mr Howard had been leader of this country since I was less a 10 year old with little understanding of the role of politics and politicians.

Thus far there are indications of major shifts in policy between the current government and those of the Howard government (and may I emphasize the “thus far” part). Kevin Rudd’s Labor government has ratified the Kyoto protocol and brought Australia into the global climate change debate which the Howard Government had repeatedly refused to do. They have also begun the process of moving towards a “Carbon Exchange” system, which the Howard Government had repeatedly delayed.

The Rudd Government also moved on reconciliation, with a formal apology on behalf of the Australian Governments past and present for the mistreatment and abduction of Aboriginal men, women and children during the “White Australia” policy and the “Stolen Generation” debacle.

Rudd also appears to be taking careful steps towards shifting Australian foreign affairs policy with the announcement of a withdrawal of Australian troops from Iraq; though not without increasing the deployment in Afghanistan to keep up impressions about Australia’s role in the United States’ so-called “war on terror”.

Then there’s the Japanese whaling issue which the Howard Government had done little to resist over the past decade; whereas the Rudd Government has announced the use of Australian military equipment for the monitoring and surveillance of Japanese whaling vessels this whaling season, with the aim of capturing footage for use in an international legal challenge against the so called “scientific” whaling carried out annually by Japan.

But Kevin is no the only thing to happen in ’07. Few can deny the changes taking place in Baghdad and surrounding provinces in Iraq’s centre. The year began with a questionable “troop surge” plan for the stabilization of Baghdad which at first seemed destined to succumb to unpopularity and questionable leadership; but the plan prevailed and it’s successes can not be discounted lightly.

Much of Baghdad is now safer than it has been any time since the invasion in 2003, and though this is not saying it is up to the pre-invasion standards it is certainly an improvement on the all-out sectarian massacres occurring for the most of 2006 and parts of early 2007.

Do not however assume this to be the success of an increase in US troops alone; nor as a sign that the Iraqi government is improving in it’s ability to stabilize the country; though some credit must be given respectively to the US & and Iraqi military forces, the large majority of improvement has come at the hands of local Iraqi militias known as the “concerned local citizen”, or the “Awakening” (though my understanding is that the “Awakening” refers to a Sunni movement born in Anbar province; while the “Concerned Local Citizen” groups exist across the board on a theoretically non-sectarian basis).

Some of my regular readers and friends will criticize me here for “falling for the propaganda” etc, but it’s not true; I am not claiming a victory for Iraq nor a heroic turn in US regional policy in the Middle East; I am merely claiming a lull in violence with an inarguable link to changes in US, Iraqi strategies for combating terrorism and extremism in Baghdad. However much Baghdad has improved throughout 2007 it has not been so across the whole of Iraq.

Iraqi Kurdistan has come under fire with the heightening of conflict between members of the PKK and Turkish military culminating in the bombing and invasion of many villages along the Northern borders of Iraqi Kurdistan. Ninevah province has suffered badly in 2007, perhaps more so than any other province in Northern Iraq.

2007 witnessed a major attack against the secluded Yazidi sect in which four bus-bombs targeted the quiet Yazidi town of Qahatinya killing over 200 people and injuring many more. Through out 2007 there has been an increasing level of abductions, assasinations and public humilation targetted those of the Yazidi sect in the areas surrounding Mosul in Ninevah province, it is believed to be the work of Salafi extremists who mistakenly view the sect as “devil worshippers” for their worship of a fallen angel mistakenly believed to be Satan.

However it is not just the Yazidi who have suffered at the hands of extremists retreating north from Baghdad and it’s surrounds; many local Moslawi citizens have fallen victim to seemingly random assasinations and car bombings. Many of the Iraqi bloggers including my friends SunshineNajma,Hnk and other members of their family report the sharp decline in security around Mosul through out 2007. Reading the news would tell you the same; though perhaps with a little more spin and an attempt to show this as a sign the “terrorists” are making a last-ditch effort to cause destruction in Iraq.

The reality is that the surge has achieved its goal of creating “a window of opportunity” for Iraqi’s to step up and crush the extremist elements hiding amongst them; to step forward and produce a new, stable economy through which they can gain the freedom and modernization they desire and feel rightly entitled to. The Iraqi government however can not achieve these goals; they are tied up in their own issues and must be sidestepped.

Foreign investment in localized projects including the rebuilding of infrastructure and municipality services such as waste management, electricity production and agriculture; is essential and should come no-strings attached.

Failing this the Iraqi government and supporting aid groups must step up to provide localized jobs for those Iraqis willing and able to rebuild the infrastructure in their areas; without such micro-economic stimulation Iraq can not recover. The Iraqi population really do need to be shown once again that “peace pays” better than war.

Interaction is awesome.

I got a response out of my last post. Some may think it was a little bit tow-the-line media regurgitation because I was talking about the good ol’ timetable. In some ways I guess those someone’s are right. Part of my reason behind writing the post was because it IS the topic of discussion and I do have opinions on it.

It’s got to be done right, but my friend is also right in asking who am I to say when is right?

I guess I am not in the position to say “when” is right but I can sure tell what is right and what is wrong.

Right would be an eventual end to the military occupation of a sovereign nation whose people have an absolute right to self-determination (elections without outside interference).

Wrong would be a withdrawal that leaves the civilians of said sovereign nation without the ability to achieve said self-determination (ie, under a dictatorship or in conditions that do not allow fair elections to be held).

Right would be leaving said civilians with access to the basic technologies and living conditions expected by any developed nation; electricity, water, sewerage, healthcare and education.

Wrong would be destroying a nations infrastructure and leaving them crippled after invading on the promise of a better future and then not deliver on that promise.

Right would be ensuring the country has a governmental system which can sustain itself; which can provide basic law, order and municipality services for its people and.

Wrong is not caring enough to find out what needs to be done to achieve those ends.

Right is approaching the local populations and asking what YOU can do for THEM to make THEIR lives better and in turn encouraging them to cooperate with both yourself and each other.

So if we are going to set a timetable it needs to include all those things which are RIGHT and none of those which are WRONG; but it also needs a SENSIBLE timeline to ensure all those involved that not only is there an end-goal, but there IS enough time to achieve it.

Mayhap I was too fast to say that the label of “occupation” must end by 2010; but then again maybe I’m not. In ideal circumstance it’s probably not too much to ask. But nothing is ever ideal and what’s going on in Iraq today is no exception.